Privilege
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Last updated
Was this helpful?
At its core, TiDB's approach to user privileges is similar to that of MySQL:
The privileges are stored in tables such as mysql.user
and mysql.db
.
The privilege tables are then loaded into an . The cache is then used by the privilege manager to determine the privileges of a user.
The cache is automatically updated when using privilege control statements such as GRANT
and REVOKE
. The statement FLUSH PRIVILEGES
can also be used to manually reload the cache for when manual changes are made to the privilege tables.
Implicit updates to the privilege cache (i.e. when GRANT
or REVOKE
statements are executed) run immediately on the instance of TiDB that is executing the statement. A to rebuild their cache. This notification is sent asynchronously, so it is possible that when a load balancer is used, the cache will be out of date when attempting to reconnect to a TiDB instance immediately.
Because the asynchronous notifications do not guarantee delivery, TiDB will also every 5-10 minutes in a loop. This behavior is not strictly MySQL compatible, because in MySQL the privilege cache will only ever be rebuilt from a FLUSH PRIVILEGES
statement, a restart, or a privilege control statement.
Client certificate options are stored in the mysql.global_priv
table instead of the mysql.user
table. This behavior is not intentional, and may be changed in the future.
Some privilege checks are automatically assigned during plan building, for example ensuring that you have permissions to the tables that will be accessed. These checks are skipped for information_schema
tables, and should you add an additional statement (such as SHOW xyz
), you will also need to ensure that privilege checks are added.
Should you need to add privilege checks there are two options:
During plan building you can attach visitInfo
to the plan (examples: , )
In the executor function which handles the statement (examples: ).
The first option is recommended, as it is much less verbose. However, visitInfo
does not handle cases where the statement can behave differently depending on the permissions of the user executing it. All users can execute the SHOW PROCESSLIST
statement, but to see the sessions of other users requires the PROCESS
privilege.
visitInfo
also only supports AND semantics. For complex scenarios (such as DROP USER
requiring either CREATE USER
OR DELETE
privileges on the mysql.user
table), option 2 is required.
For (2) above, manual checks should follow the following pattern:
The check for checker != nil
is important because for internal SQL statements the privilege manager is not present. These statements are expected to fall through and satisfy the privilege check.
Privileges fall into two categories:
Static privileges: These are the "traditional" privileges such as INSERT
, UPDATE
, SELECT
, DELETE
, SUPER
, PROCESS
which have existed in MySQL for a long time. They can usually be assigned to a user on either a global or database/table level.
Dynamic privileges: These are new privileges such as BACKUP_ADMIN
, RESTORE_ADMIN
, CONNECTION_ADMIN
. They can only be assigned on a global level, and each have their own "grantable" attribute.
Dynamic privileges were introduced in MySQL 8.0 (and ) to solve a specific issue, which is that the SUPER
privilege is too coarse. There are many scenarios where a user needs to be assigned the SUPER
privilege to perform a specific action, but too many other privileges are granted at the same time.
Any statements added to TiDB should no longer require the SUPER
privilege directly. Instead, a dynamic privilege should be added by the SUPER
privilege.
TiDB features an extension to MySQL called (SEM), which is disabled by default. One of the main aims of SEM is to reduce the privileges of SUPER
and instead require specific "restricted" dynamic privileges instead. The design is inspired by features such as "Security Enhanced Linux" (SeLinux) and AppArmor.
SEM plugs directly into the privilege manager, but the hard coded list of restricted objects lives in . It is expected that over time SEM will protect against additional operations which are considered to be high risk or too broad.